美國政府利用各種方法打開台灣豬肉市場
重點在最後幾段!NPPC Wants Taiwan To Lift Ractopamine Ban
Contact: Dave Warner 202-347-3600
WASHINGTON,D.C., July 30, 2012 – In a letter sent today to Obama administration trade officials, the National Pork Producers Council expressed its strong objection to re-opening Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) negotiations with Taiwan because of that country’s continued failure to lift a ban on a widely approved dietary additive used in pork production.
The Taiwanese parliament recently voted to ease restrictions on U.S. beef imports from cattle produced with Ractopamine but left the ban in place on pork produced with the same product.
Ractopamine is a dietary additive that improves the feed efficiency, growth rate and lean carcass percentage of live hogs and cattle. It has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and by the food-safety agencies in 24 countries. Earlier this month, the U.N.’s Codex Alimentarius, which sets international standards for food products, approved a maximum residue limit (MRL) for Ractopamine, which U.S. pork meets.
“Failing to lift the ractopamine ban for pork was not an inadvertent omission,” said NPPC President R.C. Hunt, a pork producer from Wilson, N.C. “It is nothing more than a ploy by the Taiwanese government to bring the United States back to the TIFA negotiating table.
“In Taiwan, pork production is much more important than beef, and pork producers have much more political clout,” Hunt added. “This, and only this, explains the decision to lift the Ractopamine ban on beef but not on pork.”
NPPC asked U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to make clear to Taiwan that lifting the Ractopamine ban for beef only will not prompt the United States to re-open TIFA talks with Taiwan. TIFA provides a framework for expanding trade and resolving trade disputes between countries.
The pork organization also urged the U.S. officials to “up the ante” on Taiwan by indicating that the United States will not support the Asian nation’s entry into negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a regional trade pact, until it drops its Ractopamine ban on pork imports.“We believe it is time for the United States to explore all potential means, including legal tools, of getting the Taiwanese to open their market,” said Hunt.
If Taiwan were to lift the Ractopamine ban on pork imports, U.S. pork exports to that country would increase to $417 million within 10 years, according to Iowa State University economist Dermot Hayes. Just $53.8 million of U.S. pork was shipped to Taiwan in 2011.
2011年銷台豬肉5千3百萬美元,含瘦肉精美豬肉成功銷台10年內可達4億1千七百萬美元! 台灣政府挺得住嗎?
豬牛分離.姓馬的麥格騙了! 本文章最後由 蘇少儀 於 2012-8-25 23:21 編輯
這個標題有錯誤
應該是美國豬肉生產協會（NPPC; http://www.nppc.org/；是民間組織（類似中華民國養豬協會））促請政府相關機構........美國豬肉出口臺灣，不是政府...............
NPPC asked 美國豬肉生產協會要求下列政府機構的首長...............................
U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk,美國貿易代表署署長
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton國務卿（類似行政院長）
Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack美國農部部長
這些才是政府
由此大家應該知道，美國是由產業協會直接或透過民意機關主導政府主管機關政策走向
大家要參與產業組織，並使其組織及功能健全
讓主管機關的施政符合產業的需要 平等互惠
美國打開台灣市場
台灣也可以賣去美國
本文章最後由 蘇少儀 於 2012-8-25 23:53 編輯
ogts 發表於 2012-8-25 23:29 static/image/common/back.gif
平等互惠
美國打開台灣市場
是可以平等互惠
但口蹄疫就讓你對美只進不出
臺灣不必再增養了
到美國去養，回銷臺灣
如果有賺錢再匯回臺灣
也是愛國心的表現 到美國養豬回銷台灣的確是個做法
日本人也去美國養牛回銷日本
小弟有一個想法不知道對不對?
把美國豬肉進到台灣的是貿易商
或是委推貿易商進口的商業團體
不知道這個說法對不對
假設這個說法是對的
貿易商會區分美國人養的美國豬?
或是台灣人養的美國豬?
是有使用受體素的豬?
還是沒有使用受體素的豬?
如果依照之前進口含來客多巴胺的美牛
被退運 或銷毀含有受體素的豬肉
的經驗來說
我想商人只會進口
價格低 利潤高的商品
:L:L:L:@ 本文章最後由 蘇少儀 於 2012-8-26 17:50 編輯
中華民國養豬協會或國營的臺糖去美國養豬再回銷臺灣
依據上項統計，美國2011年銷往臺灣的豬肉約為220,000頭毛豬
目標是10年內增加8倍到1,760,000頭
臺灣國產降約20%（80-20法則，自產80%，進口20%，想想誰會留下，誰會走）
運用美國資源，海外生產1,760,000頭，回銷臺灣
這些豬肉量進入相關通路，貿易商大概也沒辦法玩了
那就沒力去結合美國豬肉生產協會效促美國政府相關機構向臺灣施壓
虛擬算盤
因為一定會有人被操作或為了自身利益（誰或誰的家人在或去美國就業，薪資多少...........吵...........），案子就一再擱置
這就是臺灣有些養豬產業組織的執行能力"一事無成，毫無建樹”
又是那句話"看看別人，想想自己"
看看美國豬肉生產協會，再想想中華民國養豬協會
國情不同，產業規模不同，內外在形勢不同.......................不同．所以不能放在一起比較．理由冠冕堂皇，一拖拉庫
哈！！！哈！！！
頁:
[1]